<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Centralizing the Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zdistrict.com/2008/09/01/centralizing-the-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zdistrict.com/2008/09/01/centralizing-the-network/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:50:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marzouq</title>
		<link>http://www.zdistrict.com/2008/09/01/centralizing-the-network/comment-page-1/#comment-172375</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzouq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zdistrict.com/?p=12948#comment-172375</guid>
		<description>N: I don&#039;t want to have a static route map, I prefer just having go through the main PC without any issues. I don&#039;t want to have to keep configuring routers when this simple patchwork is working! 

Adrenaline: I can access my ftp and all my connections without an issue, the issue is just combining networks. 

Shaymaa: Through a router you can bound it to load balance, but with certain load balancers you can aggrigate the connections to get more speed, so that works. My Nvidai motherboard seems to be handling it without any issue. 

popcorn: I know but it does require some work and effort that I am not willing to put into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N: I don&#8217;t want to have a static route map, I prefer just having go through the main PC without any issues. I don&#8217;t want to have to keep configuring routers when this simple patchwork is working! </p>
<p>Adrenaline: I can access my ftp and all my connections without an issue, the issue is just combining networks. </p>
<p>Shaymaa: Through a router you can bound it to load balance, but with certain load balancers you can aggrigate the connections to get more speed, so that works. My Nvidai motherboard seems to be handling it without any issue. </p>
<p>popcorn: I know but it does require some work and effort that I am not willing to put into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: popcorn</title>
		<link>http://www.zdistrict.com/2008/09/01/centralizing-the-network/comment-page-1/#comment-170390</link>
		<dc:creator>popcorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zdistrict.com/?p=12948#comment-170390</guid>
		<description>openbsd&#039;s firewall can do load balancing. no need to buy any special hardware if you have an old pc laying around

www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>openbsd&#8217;s firewall can do load balancing. no need to buy any special hardware if you have an old pc laying around</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaymaa</title>
		<link>http://www.zdistrict.com/2008/09/01/centralizing-the-network/comment-page-1/#comment-170178</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaymaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zdistrict.com/?p=12948#comment-170178</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I am wrong, but bonding two internet connections together at the router will not give you more speed, it will only allow you to max out one connection.

So when someone else starts to download a large file the router will send them over to the other connection.

I&#039;d like to know how you&#039;d merge the two connections without the load balancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I am wrong, but bonding two internet connections together at the router will not give you more speed, it will only allow you to max out one connection.</p>
<p>So when someone else starts to download a large file the router will send them over to the other connection.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know how you&#8217;d merge the two connections without the load balancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrenaline</title>
		<link>http://www.zdistrict.com/2008/09/01/centralizing-the-network/comment-page-1/#comment-170162</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrenaline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zdistrict.com/?p=12948#comment-170162</guid>
		<description>My Mac has Azue running all the time, its connected to my HD 42LCD and the sound system so i watch my movies and browse the net directly form there at the same time Azue is still running, its also running an FTP server and a http server -i stopped the http it was just for testing-

I have another very old mac for storage so once am done with a movie i just move it there,

Even when am away i log to mac remotely to check on my downloads, and i use the ftp to add new  torrents to Azue....u pay for a 2mb then you have to juice it.

Get a Mac they can handle the abuse and still manage to look and act cool, not to mention the 1GB ethernet and wireless N.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Mac has Azue running all the time, its connected to my HD 42LCD and the sound system so i watch my movies and browse the net directly form there at the same time Azue is still running, its also running an FTP server and a http server -i stopped the http it was just for testing-</p>
<p>I have another very old mac for storage so once am done with a movie i just move it there,</p>
<p>Even when am away i log to mac remotely to check on my downloads, and i use the ftp to add new  torrents to Azue&#8230;.u pay for a 2mb then you have to juice it.</p>
<p>Get a Mac they can handle the abuse and still manage to look and act cool, not to mention the 1GB ethernet and wireless N.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.</title>
		<link>http://www.zdistrict.com/2008/09/01/centralizing-the-network/comment-page-1/#comment-170019</link>
		<dc:creator>N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zdistrict.com/?p=12948#comment-170019</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s not a bad idea, going through that PC if it can handle the network. Couldn&#039;t you just add a gigabit router to the network and add a static route map on it? That seems easier to manage than having it done through a PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s not a bad idea, going through that PC if it can handle the network. Couldn&#8217;t you just add a gigabit router to the network and add a static route map on it? That seems easier to manage than having it done through a PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

